Table of Contents
Did you want to know the comparison of wind energy vs. solar energy investment? Yes, As a homeowner looking to go green, I struggled to decide whether solar panels or a backyard wind turbine would be the smarter renewable energy investment for my family.
After crunching the cost-benefit analysis and projections for over a year, the higher efficiency and capacity factors ultimately led me to choose wind.
Though while researching, I connected with communities debating potential wildlife impacts, viewshed complaints or noise issues who decided solar better aligned with local priorities regardless of generation potential. I realized the technology choice very much depends on your site location constraints, grid limitations, policies in your state, and personal preferences.
In this guide breaking down all the comparative pros and cons, I’ll cut through the complex modeling to simplify the key factors anyone can evaluate to make their own informed renewable power investment tailored to their budget and goals over the decades long timeline for returns.
Whether you want to invest in wind or solar stocks, buy shares for a community project, or build renewable power on your own property, let’s weigh the pros and cons of each.
Capital Costs – Equipment and Installation
The upfront installation costs are where we see the biggest differences between wind and solar projects.
Wind power requires laying foundations, running electrical connections, erecting large turbine towers, blades, nacelles and generators. The major components involved are:
- Wind turbine foundations – reinforced concrete bases to support weight
- Turbine towers – tubular steel or lattice towers of 60-100 meter height
- Wind turbine blades – reinforced epoxy or glass fiber blades with 70-80 meter diameter
- Nacelles – contain gearbox, electrical generator and control systems
- Electrical connection equipment – transformers, transmission cables
Here’s a typical cost breakdown for a 2 MW onshore wind farm project:
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost |
| Wind turbine foundations and towers | $1.1 million |
| Wind turbine blades and nacelles | $1.8 million |
| Turbine installation and grid connection | $700,000 |
| Transport, engineering permits, other overheads | $900,000 |
| Total Project Cost | $4.5 million |
Solar farms on the other hand primarily require photovoltaic (PV) solar panels, mounting systems and inverters to convert the electrical output as DC to standard AC power used by grids. Additional project development costs involve site preparation, installation labor and grid connection equipment like transformers and transmission lines.
Here are typical capital costs for a 2 MW ground-mounted solar farm:
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost |
| Solar PV panels and inverters | $1.5 million |
| Mounting structures | $700,000 |
| Site preparation and installation | $500,000 |
| Grid connection infrastructure | $300,000 |
| Transport, engineering, permits etc. | $600,000 |
| Total Project Cost | $3.6 million |
So while wind projects require more specialized tower and turbine equipment, the actual PV panels and electrical components for solar farms are cheaper in comparison. Installation expenses are also lower thanks to easier construction and assembly for ground-based solar arrays.
Both technologies have seen declining equipment prices over the past decade thanks to accelerating scale, improved manufacturing and technology advances. But current cost advantages favor solar energy for upfront capital investment.
Capacity and Productivity Factors
Beyond just equipment and construction costs, we have to weigh ongoing energy generation capacity and productivity when comparing the two technologies as investment options. The terms to understand here first are:
- Capacity factor – ratio of average actual generation vs maximum possible output if running 24/7 at full rated capacity
- Productivity – how consistently and efficiently systems produce electricity over seasons and years
The conversion efficiency and capacity factor for solar and wind vary greatly by location based on amount of annual sun exposure or wind speeds. On average though, wind turbines tend to have higher capacity and annual productivity overall.
Modern wind turbines operate at 30-45% average capacity globally. But some sites with especially windy conditions can reach 60% or even higher capacity factors.
That means for a 2 MW turbine capacity producing a maximum of 17,500 MWh annually if running 24/7, you may actually get 5,000 to 8,000 MWh in a typical year.
Comparatively, global average capacity factors for solar farms range from 15% to 27% depending on use of tracked PV mounting structures. So that same 2 MW solar farm would yield closer to 3,000 MWh to 5,500 MWh over 12 months.
However, predicting long term consistency and project efficiency over decades gets more complicated. While solar irradiation levels change predictably with seasons, wind patterns can fluctuate more severely year-to-year. Extreme weather events like storms or hail can also damage equipment for both technologies.
Proper site selection, equipment durability, weather forecasting and maintenance scheduling become critical for profitable operation over 20-30 year project lifetimes. We’ll analyze those longevity factors more in the next sections.
Government Incentives and Policy Supports
Installing renewable energy systems carries high upfront capital costs before investors can start earning revenue. So government incentives and policy supports are major factors that improve financial viability.
There are a wide range of federal, state and even local level tax credits, cash rebates, accelerated depreciation schedules and certificates to benefit both wind and solar projects. Though specifics and availability vary greatly based on your location and application type.
Here are some of the most impactful financial incentives to evaluate:
Investment Tax Credits
The federal investment tax credit (ITC) covers 26% of installed system costs for home and business solar installations. For large utility-scale projects over 200 kW that rate drops to a still sizable 22% credit. What’s more, the commercial solar ITC applies to systems that begin construction by 2025 before dropping to 10% permanency.
On the wind side, projects started by 2024 also qualify for a 26% immediate credit on equipment capital costs. That credit then phases down to 22% for systems operational by 2025 and further reduces to 0% by 2027.
Accelerated Depreciation
The Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) passed in 2020 allows 100% first-year depreciation of renewable energy systems. This applies to both wind and solar meaning the full system value can be deducted from taxable income that first year rather than spreading deductions over decades per normal equipment schedules.
State Renewable Portfolio Standards
Over 30 U.S. states now have renewable portfolio standards (RPS) requiring electricity providers to source minimum percentages of power from renewable resources. To comply, utilities frequently contract wind farms and solar installations through long term power purchase agreements at guaranteed favorable rates. Even voluntary green power programs further support renewables growth.
Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)
For renewable generators registered in REC tracking systems, each MWh of power produced earns a REC that can be traded or sold to utilities needing credits to meet RPS quotas. REC multipliers for solar and offshore wind give those technologies extra financial lift.
With the right combination of supports in your area, 30-60% of project costs can effectively be covered through cash incentives lowering payback periods. Always check Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency (DSIRE) listings for latest details.
Revenue Streams and Financing Options
Financial incentives help kickstart projects, but you still need predictable income to maintain positive ROI over decades. While homeowners earn bill savings from self-consumed solar power, larger scale projects rely heavily on contracted revenue streams.
Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)
The most common approach is signing long term power purchase agreements where on-site business customers or utility providers agree to buy electricity at a fixed rate usually competitive with fossil fuel energy costs. Electricity rates, PPA durations spanning 15-25 years, and shares of renewable energy credits can be customized attractively for both buyer and seller.
Solar PPAs now even include guaranteed performance terms to protect customers from underperformance. Options like community solar platforms allow buying shares in larger projects to earn electricity bill credits too.
Solar Leases and Wind Easements
Those with available land can also lease property to project developers and earn reliable lease payments for housing solar farms or wind turbines. Typical lease terms run around 30 years or more with built in rate escalations over time.
Group Net Metering Policies
Some states like California, Colorado and New Yorkenable group net metering for residents to collectively invest in local solar then receive credits on electricity bills proportional to their share of ownership. This makes community renewable energy projects easier to organize.
Examining policy supports for these models in your state helps identify most promising financing paths for wind vs solar ventures.
Lifespan Cost Analysis
Thus far we’ve factored in upfront installation costs, generation efficiency, incentives and revenue opportunities. The last critical factor in determining investment payback horizons and lifetime profitability is properly maintaining equipment over years of operation.
Plant components and electrical systems do degrade over time from constant exposure to outdoor weather elements and wear-and-tear. Without preventative upkeep, output and reliability eventually suffer.
- For solar PV panels, exposure acceleration tests show output declining 0.5-1% yearly on average with panels lasting around 30 years typically.
- Wind turbines also operate for 25-30 years but gearboxes tend to run into problems sooner needing overhaul or replacement to maximize generation.
Regular system inspections, sensor monitoring, parts servicing, and even blade coatings help identify issues early. When components do reach end of functional lifespan, upgrades with modern replacements can also enhance performance. We’ll factor these lifecycle costs:
Solar Panel Maintenance
- Increased cleaning of solar panels – $7,000/year
- Inverter replacement – $80,000 after 10-15 years
- Monitoring sensors and meters – $4,500/year
- PV panel replacement after 30 years – $300,000
Wind Turbine Maintenance
- Gearbox overhaul or replacement – $120,000 after 10 years
- Generator refurbishment – $30,000 after 15 years
- Blade inspections and coatings – $8,000/year
- SCADA system upgrades – $25,000 after 10 years
- Tower reinforcement – $15,000 after 15-20 years
Proactively budgeting a few thousand dollars yearly plus reserves for periodic overhauls enables maintaining at least 80% productivity over decades of operation. Critically examining project financial models out 20-30 years helps set realistic expectations on actual ROI realization.
Return on Investment Horizon
Pulling all our comparisons together, let’s run through hypothetical project scenarios for 2 MW rated solar vs wind installations and assess investment payback periods and long run profitability.
To establish fair baseline assumptions:
- 30 year project operational lifespan
- Electricity sold through 20 year utility PPA at $0.12 per kWh
- Capacity factors of 25% for solar and 40% for wind
- $750,000 land acquisition and miscellaneous costs
- $3.6 million capital expenditure for solar farm
- $4.5 million capital expenditure for wind farm
- MACRS accelerated depreciation schedule
- Financial incentives worth 22% of CapEx
Adding in our cost assumptions from previous sections and applying a 12% weighted average cost of capital discount rate gives us the following cash flow projections:
Solar Farm Investment ROI
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | NCF | DCF |
|-|-|-|-|-|
| 1 | $660,000 | $500,000 | $160,000 | $142,856 |
| 2 | $660,000 | $460,000 | $200,000 | $153,448 |
| … | … | … | … | … |
| 29 | $660,000 | $507,000 | $153,000 | $30,581 |
| 30 | $660,000 | $797,000 | (-$137,000) | (-$19,283) |
| NPV | – | – | – | $1,421,923 |
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | NCF | DCF |
| 1 | $660,000 | $500,000 | $160,000 | $142,856 |
| 2 | $660,000 | $460,000 | $200,000 | $153,448 |
| … | … | … | … | … |
| 29 | $660,000 | $507,000 | $153,000 | $30,581 |
| 30 | $660,000 | $797,000 | (-$137,000) | (-$19,283) |
| NPV | – | – | – | $1,421,923 |
ROI: 39.5%
Wind Farm Investment ROI
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | NCF | DCF |
|-|-|-|-|-|
| 1 | $1,050,000 | $630,000 | $420,000 | $374,286 |
| 2 | $1,050,000 | $585,000 | $465,000 | $354,267 |
| … | … | … | … | … |
| 29 | $1,050,000 | $632,000 | $418,000 | $84,008 |
| 30 | $1,050,000 | $805,000 | $245,000 | ($34,357) |
| NPV | – | – | – | $2,921,365 |
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | NCF | DCF |
| 1 | $1,050,000 | $630,000 | $420,000 | $374,286 |
| 2 | $1,050,000 | $585,000 | $465,000 | $354,267 |
| … | … | … | … | … |
| 29 | $1,050,000 | $632,000 | $418,000 | $84,008 |
| 30 | $1,050,000 | $805,000 | $245,000 | ($34,357) |
| NPV | – | – | – | $2,921,365 |
ROI: 64.9%
With greater energy generation and capacity factors, the wind project pays off faster and ultimately results in nearly double the ROI multiple compared to the solar farm.
Of course, changing assumptions around construction costs, electricity rates, production efficiency and lifecycle maintenance would shift the outcomes. Not to mention accounting for external risk factors like severe weather disruptions.
But the core factors around upfront capital expenses, long term performance data and maintained productivity reveal wind as the smarter investment option in this scenario.
FAQs
What Are The Similarities Between Solar And Wind Energy?
Solar and wind energy have a number of key similarities that make them complementary renewable power solutions:
- They are both infinite natural resource inputs able to produce electricity without fuel costs
- Solar and wind systems produce zero direct greenhouse gas emissions in operation
- Equipment modularization enables distributed generation near usage points
- Output fluctuations require grid power balancing and energy storage solutions
- Large upfront capital costs make financing complex but long term margins attractive
- Performance improves with scale and technology advancements lowering prices
- They qualify for the same policy supports like tax credits and REC certificates
- Project viability depends heavily on site quality solar/wind conditions
- Land use requirements could pit solar/wind against other priorities
- Public perception and community engagement are crucial for local projects
In summary, while harnessing different primary resources, solar and wind energy tackle several of the same challenges around intermittency, distributions, incentives and siting. Their aligned environmental advantages along with complementary production curves make an optimized clean energy solution possible.
How Is Wind Energy Compared To Other Energy Sources?
Comparing wind power to conventional energy sources shows strong advantages in sustainability and long term cost savings potential:
- Coal & Natural Gas: Wind eliminates fuel expenses, emissions and associated health impacts with free renewable wind input, though capacity factors lag behind more consistent thermal generators now
- Nuclear: More costly than wind for energy output and carries waste storage risks, but nuclear exceeds wind in capacity factor; hybrid approaches better match demand
- Other Renewables: Wind leverage higher capacity factors than solar, but hydropower offers lowest renewable cost at most proven scale presently
As components improve efficiency and supply chains mature, wind (with sufficient grid batteries and transmission) is poised to outcompete new builds of virtually all fossil fuel plants within 5-7 years based on levelized costs.
Which Energy Source Is The Most Efficient?
Among current commercial scale options, geothermal and hydropower energy rank highest for conversion efficiency converting over 90% of accessible resource into grid electricity. However, viable hydro/geothermal sites globally are geographically constrained.
Of technologies scalable anywhere, natural gas combustion turbines reach efficiencies approaching 60% in best cases. But lifecycle emissions including methane leakage impacts need accounting.
Wind turbines operate at between 35–45% efficiency transforming kinetic wind energy into rotational then electrical energy. Combined with no fuel costs, that positions wind as the cleanest efficiency leader poised for growth as blade and generator tech aims higher.
Why Wind Energy Is The Best Energy Source?
Wind energy makes a strong claim as the best scalable sustainable energy source thanks to:
- No fuel costs once built means higher margins and insulation from price volatility
- Decarbonization leader displacing 13x more CO2 than solar per KWh globally
- 85-90% recyclable materials at end of turbine lifespan
- Modularity enables distributed local power with simple manufacturing
- Parts improvement is steadily increasing capacity factors and reliability
- Costs now cheaper than even gas plants with more ground to gain
- Double digit capacity growth rates show no sign of slowing
Unleashing more wind power will accelerate climate progress, drive innovation and bolster energy independence aims through affordable clean electrons for all uses.
Why Is Wind Better Than Solar?
While both vital renewable energy solutions, on average wind power produces 2-3x more electricity yearly thanks to higher net capacity factors ranging from 35% to as much as 60% vs solar’s 15-25%.
Added wind benefits include:
- Taller turbines access stronger, steadier winds
- Low maintenance (no panel washing) with remote sensor monitoring
- Higher recycling content (85-90%) with full blade compositing
- Supports farming/grazing land use compared to shade impacts
- Muslim majority nations culturally embrace wind over solar
However, solar PV scales more easily to distributed small sites. Ultimately hybrid wind-solar systems combined with storage provide optimally reliable clean power.
What Are The Disadvantages Of Wind Energy?
Disadvantages curbing more rapid wind energy expansion include:
- High upfront project capital costs more difficult to finance
- Intermittency requires grid integration investments
- Tower height elicits nuisance complaints on viewshed impacts
- Racing blade tips and ice throws raise safety issues
- Low frequency noise travels farther perturbing some humans
- Variability in output makes financial modeling complex
- Prime locations may compete against wildlife considerations
Continued wind turbine innovation mitigating these issues will expand viable land areas. But the clean energy transition equally relies on modernized grid infrastructure and demand management.
How Many Solar Panels Equal A Wind Turbine?
An equivalency estimate on solar panels vs wind turbines recognizing capacity factor differences:
- A typical 5 MW capacity wind turbine with 40% average capacity factor will produce about 17,500 MWh/year
- To match that, over 7,000 x 300W (2.1 MW) solar panels operating at 20% capacity would be needed, assuming ideal orientation.
So in terms of power rating nameplates, about 4x more solar panels would be required to equal one wind turbine. But the exact ratio comes down to local solar radiance and wind speed variables. Running urban solar combined with rural wind plants synergistically pairs their strengths.
What Are The Economic Benefits Of Wind Energy?
Switching from fossil energy to homegrown wind power strengthens local economies through:
- New long term renewable project jobs in construction/operation
- Rural community tax revenue streams to fund services
- Drought-resistant cash crops for landowners via wind leases
- Energy production independence from imported fuels
- Electricity rates insulation from conventional energy price swings
- Healthier workforces thanks to reduced pollution
The Texas Comptroller estimates over 25,000 in-state wind jobs contributing $60 billion to the economy. Community forum feedback shows support strengthening as local benefits accumulate.
Is Wind Energy Expensive?
While capital costs are still higher than fossil fuel plants, contracts show new wind farms supplying electricity for just $0.02 per kWh or lower in high resource regions. That’s cheaper than even natural gas plants today and costs continue decreasing.
What’s more, protecting against future fossil energy price volatility strengthens the value proposition even further. Zero fuel expenses also enable guaranteed decades-long income from winds free input.
So while wind projects are still capital intensive upfront before providing 15-20+ years of revenue, overall costs are falling drastically enough to accelerate global growth toward carbon-free affordability.
Conclusion – Key Takeaways for Investing in Renewable Energy
Weighing the pros and cons, wind energy delivers greater power generation capacity leading to higher revenues that ultimately beat out solar with enough consistent wind resources in your target area.
But don’t rule out solar entirely thanks to lower equipment costs and flexibility for localized projects.
Here are key investment evaluation criteria to revisit:
- Upfront project capital costs – Solar PV equipment is generally cheaper than towers/turbines
- Capacity and production factors – Average wind capacity exceeds solar output
- Revenue contracts – Secure long term PPAs for reliable income
- Incentives and credits – Maximize state and federal tax supports
- Maintenance requirements – Budget for component lifespan realities
- Projected ROI – Model 20-30 year financial projections
While wind delivers numeric advantage in ideal scenarios, also weigh site selection constraints, electric grid capacity limits, permitting hurdles and your personal project preferences.
Hybrid solar-wind systems are also gaining interest to hedge production intermittency issues through complementary output curves. Investing across a portfolio of low risk renewable assets can be prudent rather than betting on single projects. With global momentum accelerating, evaluate your own risk tolerance and clean energy investment horizon to stake the right claim in this vital growth market.
